If I had seen Penn & Teller’s Bullshit episode on gun control a couple of weeks ago, I probably would have said something like, “you guys make some interesting arguments, but does a civilized society really need to be armed? Come on now, the government is elected, we can just vote the scoundrels out of office if need be. I agree that there are legitimate uses for guns – hunting, target shooting and so on. But really, aren’t you going a bit overboard with the whole armed citizen thing? Let’s get back to reality.” I’m pretty sure I would have said something like that.
Not anymore. Things have changed in the last week or so. Or maybe they’ve always been like this and I didn’t want to notice. The U.S. Supreme Court has declared that developers can bribe corrupt local governments make sizeable campaign contributions to politicians who will gladly steal your home (legally under eminent domain, of course) even though the loss of your property benefits no one but the developer and the politicians.
I used to think that some form of gun control was needed, that automatic weapons should be limited to those who really need them and I was a bit distressed at all the laws being passed that allowed regular citizens to carry firearms. I’ve changed my opinion and I now agree with Penn & Teller. As long as there are people in government who sell themselves to the highest bidder, the citizenry needs the second amendment. Guns can protect us from all kinds of criminals, not just the ones wearing gang colors. We need less gun control, not more.




